Back to Resources
Association Loans · 4 min read

What Florida's 2025 condo law changes mean for your budget season

The waiver era is over. Here is how boards should approach the first full budget under funded reserves.

Florida boards have spent two years absorbing the shockwaves of SB 4-D. This is the budget season where the theory becomes a line item. Milestone inspections are on schedule, Structural Integrity Reserve Studies are on file, and — for the first time in most associations' history — reserves are mandatory, fully funded, and no longer waivable by an owner vote. That is not a paperwork change. It is a math change that hits every unit owner's next statement.

The intent of the law is straightforward: the components that hold a building up must be funded by the people who use them, on the schedule the engineer prescribes. In practice, that intent collides with three decades of Florida associations that quietly waived reserves to keep monthly fees down. Those chickens have come home. Boards now have to explain, defend, and price a budget that looks nothing like last year's.

What actually changed

Three shifts matter most. First, condominium buildings three stories and taller must complete milestone inspections at 25 or 30 years and every ten years after. Second, those buildings must conduct a SIRS at least every ten years, covering the structural components an engineer identifies. Third, associations must fully fund the reserves the SIRS recommends — the historic owner waiver is no longer available for those components. Financing the work through assessments, special assessments, loans, or lines of credit is expressly permitted, but funding it is not optional.

What that means for your budget

Most boards are looking at reserve contributions that are two to five times last year's number, plus a repair scope that arrives faster than the reserve can build. The instinct is to spread the pain across three levers — raise the monthly assessment, levy a special assessment, or take out an association loan — and pick the least bad. That is the right instinct. The mistake is picking the lever before running the math for owners.

  • Raise assessments. Predictable and cheap, but slow. If the SIRS calls for a roof and structural repairs inside 36 months, monthly increases alone rarely get there.
  • Special assessment. Fastest to fund, cheapest to the association, and often catastrophic for retirees and fixed-income owners who cannot write a five-figure check on short notice.
  • Association loan. Spreads the cost over 10 to 20 years and turns a one-time shock into a manageable monthly line item. Requires an owner vote and adds interest expense — but keeps owners in their homes.

How to run the season

Start early. The board that walks into the annual meeting with three numbers on the same slide — per-unit monthly under an assessment increase, per-unit lump sum under a special assessment, and per-unit monthly under a loan — is the board that gets a vote and keeps its owners. Boards that arrive with only one option, or with numbers dated last quarter, spend the meeting defending instead of deciding.

The competitive process matters as much as the math. Fiduciary duty is not just choosing the cheapest path; it is documenting that the board weighed real alternatives. A single term sheet from the association's current bank is not a process. Three to five term sheets, on comparable terms, from lenders that actually finance associations — that is a process, and it is the protection owners and attorneys look for when the vote is contested.

What to bring to your first working session

Every meaningful decision this season keys off the same short list: the SIRS report and its funding schedule, the current reserve balance, the latest audit, the current budget, the delinquency rate, and the association's insurance certificates. Assemble that packet once, keep it current, and you can run the math for any path in an afternoon.

Board resource

The Board Member's Guide to Association Loans

A 20-page plain-English guide: SIRS obligations, the math boards ask about most, what lenders want in the package, and a checklist for the owner vote.

Illustrative examples only — not a quote, rate offer, or commitment. Actual terms depend on lender underwriting.

Twenty minutes. Three numbers. A written analysis you can plan around.

Get Your Free Analysis